In the 21st century, illusion is the new reality . . .

Filling the vacuum created by secrecy . . .

THIS presentation is the result of my inquiry into the "terrorist attacks" of March 15, 2019, in Christchurch, New Zealand. The page will be updated whenever new material comes to hand, or whenever old material is discounted. I will, however, retain most abandoned theories, as even misconceptions have something to tell us. As I said when I first addressed the issue of the "shootings", I am doing this because I do not trust the New Zealand Government to tell us the truth. The Government's prime aim is to control the narrative, and to silence dissent with threats of savage punishment (See Footnote). If it is now dismayed by all the speculation surrounding the Christchurch events, it has only itself to blame. Secrecy creates a vacuum that speculation will always fill. That's because human beings have an irrepressible desire — and, indeed, a duty — to search and understand. The original website was constructed in April 2019, and was last updated on January 19, 2026. The last capture by WaybackMachine, on November 26, 2025, is here.

The introductory paragraphs immediately below were written in November 2023, and replace the introduction of 2019. By 2022, this had been overtaken by events, and was no longer entirely relevant. I have, however, reposted it here, after retaining the link to the series of pictures of "shooting survivors" with indeterminate "injuries" to their left arms (see here). One of my readers, in a post on Twitter, has noted that I quote Greg Hallett, and has suggested that, in doing so, I have compromised my credibility. But my purpose is not to advance any particular opinion on any aspect of the Christchurch "shootings", but to record all dissenting opinions of interest. I also quote Max Igan, who is not always the most astute observer — as Peekay points out in this video at archive.org. Finally, I would like to reiterate that no conclusions are drawn on the question of whether or not anyone was killed on March 15, 2019, or during the days that led up to that date, since deaths and/or disappearances could have occurred in unknown circumstances. See Why I Now Believe the New Zealand Event Was a Complete Hoax With Zero Dead, by Kurt Haskell, for more information and analysis. — Basil Throckmorton, nolies(at)chchtruth.com. Emails may be published on the "About" page.  

---

In the wake of Christchurch, whitey is the new bête noire — lower than even a cockroach. Needless to say, this is hate speech. It's also incitement. But it's acceptable in the emerging imperium, because it comes from the Left — those who will soon be calling themselves Aotearoans.

---

The past few years have been the most divisive in Western society since the Reformation of the 16th century, even as the banner of "inclusivity" has been hoisted higher and higher. Also noticeable, in this era of "identity politics", is the insidious erosion of middle ground, which has driven even the dispassionate observer to one extreme or the other.

"Fuck white supremacy," the above sign reads, priming the mind for the subsequent assertion (below) that "all white Australians" — and, by extension, "whites" throughout the world — should shoulder some of the blame for the massacre at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, on March 15, 2019.

But was there a massacre, or even a shooting, at Al Noor Mosque? Did anyone die, or suffer more than a scratch, in the event recorded by the GoPro camera of alleged shooter Brenton Tarrant?

The question is even more pertinent in the case of the Linwood Islamic Center event. In a video that has never been officially acknowledged, we see a crude, amateurish simulation of the aftermath of a terrorist attack. Crisis actors walk around, feign injuries, and wail theatrically, while others passively watch. It was made with a smartphone and reportedly uploaded to a porn site on March 14 — the night before Tarrant's alleged rampage. — Talking about "Rainbow Islam". . .   Check out this cool dude from broken, post-Assad Syria.

Visitors to this website are invited to scroll down and examine the collection of photographs of allegedly wounded worshipers being transported to, or arriving at, the local hospital. There isn't a spot of blood on any of them. Likewise, "shooting victims" supposedly lying in hospital beds are not connected to monitoring equipment, and have no visible injuries. Most are shown smiling happily, surrounded by well-wishers. In one case — that of Mustafa Boztaş — a left arm that shows no sign of injury in hospital is bandaged at a subsequent commemorative event. Like several of the other "victims", he sits in a wheelchair with a blanket draped over his lap — to emphasize his invalid status.

Another prominent "victim", Adeeb Sami, said his experience on March 15 was "like being in a movie". He laughed so much, and so hysterically, one suspects his handlers had to tell him to shut up. At any rate, we don't hear from him these days. There is more about Adeeb Sami in the section below on Al Noor "shooting" anomalies, and on a dedicated page here. Other "survivors" with dedicated pages are Zulfirman Syah, Mohamed Jama, Taj Mohammad Kamran, Tarik Chenafa, Sheikh Hasan Rubel, and Temel Ataçocuğu. The faces of 49 of the 51 alleged fatalities are here, on the cover of Woman's Day for April 1, 2019. The BBC's list of alleged fatalities is here, and Newshub's list is here.

---

Poor whitey! As the iniquity of the fathers is visited upon the sons, he must forever cry "mea culpa". And doubly cursed is he who also carries the burden of "toxic masculinity". He had better go, cap in hand, and seek forgiveness from his new masters in the "rainbow community". . . perhaps even pay "reparations". As the above Slate subhead says, there can never be enough contrition.

---

---

So what was the purpose of this subterfuge? The answer, this website suggests, is the same as it was at the time of the incident's precursors — the terrorist attacks of Operation Gladio between the 1950s and 1980s: To maintain a "strategy of tension" and to make people amenable to the loss of their civil liberties. See the dedicated page in which a Gladio hitman tells all.

Specifically, in the case of the Christchurch "attack", pretexts were needed for:

The confiscation of semi-automatic weapons, i.e. the means of self-defense. This is the prime aim of the architects of the New World Order, which envisages total control of the population by a technocratic elite;

The wholesale censorship of the social media (via the "Christchurch Call"). Unrestricted communication between citizens, which leads to the rise of viewpoints at odds with the official propaganda, is anathema to the elite.

The perpetrators of the Christchurch false-flag operation probably also hoped:

To co-opt the Muslim community. In this regard, it's worth noting that Al Noor Mosque — now portrayed in the press as an oasis of peace and light — has a long history of Salafism (Islamic fundamentalism) and bitter infighting. See also The Massacre Mosque, A Hideout of Al-Qaeda Jihadists, translated from the Italian;

To catapult the relatively unknown Jacinda Ardern on to the world stage as a new type of "empathetic" leader who espouses "kindness" and demonstratively embraces bereaved widows. Most observers expect her to end up in a sinecure at the UN, which is where her mentor, former prime minister Helen Clark, found her final perch.

The last objective was certainly achieved, though Ardern lost her luster at home after the imposition of lockdown and vaccine mandates during the draconian "Covid response" of 2020-22. During this period, 11,000 health care staff in "critical" health services were granted exemptions from the Covid "vaccine" that lesser mortals were coerced to take.

---

The link — albeit oblique — to the Balkan wars of the 1990s is not as surprising as it might seem. (See the video of Tarrant's signature tune, Serbia Strong, below.) The take-home message from the conflict in the former Yugoslavia was "Muslim Bosniak/Kosovar=Good; Christian Serb=Bad", which is similar to the take-home message of Christchurch, after decades of denigration of Islam in New Zealand. Thus, the Christchurch event was a cultural-political coup — a radical reversal of precedent — as much as it was a "terrorist attack". Incongruously, it has also seen local Muslims embrace the wishy-washy gospel of John Lennon: "All you need is love." See the cover of Woman's Weekly, April 1, 2019.

---

Don't ask for answers: Lips are sealed in the Garden City

Irecently bumped into an old acquaintance — a retired District Court judge.
"What are you doing these days?" he asked.
"Well, among other things, I'm investigating that mosque shooting hoax in Christchurch," I replied.
"Hoax?" he said, making a face of mock bewilderment that was presumably intended to throw me off balance.
"Yes, hoax," I said. "Just look at their testimonies . . ."
"I'm looking at testimonies all the time," he shot back. But then, before I had a chance to suggest he also look at the "live stream", he changed the subject.

That's about as far as any conversation about the Christchurch "shooting" goes. Any questioning of the official narrative elicits either an embarrassed silence or a spirited defense of it and a suggestion one speak to some of the "survivors" of the "shooting", or to doctors and nurses who treated them. (I have tried to contact knowledgeable people in Christchurch, without success.)

I'm convinced that, even if all the anomalies in the official narrative were publicly revealed, most people would still believe that, essentially, the narrative remained true — just as they still believe a man in a cave in the mountains of Afghanistan did 9/11.

Another common riposte to any claim of a widespread cover-up is that "someone would have talked". But would they, after signing a non-disclosure agreement and being warned of the severe consequences of letting any secrets slip? In the case of the Christchurch crisis actors, these consequences could include loss of immigration status, imprisonment and deportation, ostracism by family and community, loss of job and livelihood, and loss of the many thousands of dollars that have flowed to the "victims" of the alleged shootings since March 15, 2019. They may have also been assured that the outpouring of sympathy that would inevitably follow the "unprecedented atrocity" would give a tremendous boost to status of Islam in New Zealand. And finally, they may have been told by their imam that their "taqiyya" (sinful act for a pious goal) would be acceptable in the eyes of the Almighty. This, if true, would represent a serious misreading of the tenets of Islam.

Russ Winter addresses the contentious issue of why "thousands of people don't come forward" with information after staged deceptions in this article from his news and analysis website, Winter Watch.

Elsewhere on his website, Winter writes: "The reason staged deceptions are preferred — meaning not involving real deaths or a limited number of deaths — is primarily because real victims or their survivors go off the rails and can't be controlled. Real false flags with real death gets very messy, whereas staged deceptions can be precisely directed and manipulated." See here.

---

News of Nov 1, 2023: Police release Al-Noor CCTV footage

If the police have this footage, and if it's genuine, they must also have footage of the "shooter" entering Al Noor — even if, as researchers maintain, the "live stream" was made in advance of March 15, 2019, and edited before being released. The screenshot shows paramedics being escorted into the mosque on March 15.

Meanwhile, the testimony of Aya Al-Umari, sister of "shooting victim" Hussein Al-Umari, has raised several questions. She claims — in the words of a NewsHub report from December 3, 2023 — she "fought", from "early on", to "see the CCTV of her brother's [heroic] actions inside Al Noor that day". One wonders how many CCTV systems the mosque had installed. Was there a camera in the prayer hall, in addition to the one above the entrance to the mosque? Was there also one in the hallway? Why was Aya so anxious to see this footage, when the "live stream" of the "gunman", which can be viewed on the internet, is purportedly an accurate representation of what happened in the mosque that day? And most crucial of all: If the CCTV footage provides more than a different perspective, and is in fundamental disagreement with the "live stream", how does one account for such a discrepancy? Click to read the article.

---

Official narrative flies in the face of core Islamic practice

While searching for anomalies in the official narrative of March 15, it's easy to overlook the violations of Islamic practice in the presentation of the drama. So let's put aside the issues of timelines, weapons, ballistics, etc., and examine the story from the perspective of the Sunnah:

1. The service — the main service of the week (Salat al-Jumu'ah) — starts when the imam says, "Dear brothers and sisters..." (According to Adeeb Sami, this is the moment he also hears the first shots being fired.)

2. Less than a minute before the service starts, two members of the congregation (Mohamed Jama and an unidentified woman) are observed loitering on the public footpath outside the mosque.

3. Between one and four members of the congregation are loitering in or near the entrance to the mosque. (See the evidence of the "live stream" and the pre-sentencing summary of "the facts" of the case by Justice Cameron Mander.)

This situation is almost inconceivable. By the time of such a service, all members of the congregation are either:

1. Sitting in rows on the floor of the prayer hall (musalla), having completed their ritual ablution (wudu) and short, personal "prayer of greeting the mosque" (Tahiyyat al-Masjid, which consists of two raka'at or cycles of prayer), or

2. Wasting no time in completing the above ablution and prayer, since no one wants to be left behind.

One simply does not find people hanging around outside the musalla, gossiping or greeting late arrivals with "Hello" or any other similar phrase in English, while the Salat al-Jumu'ah is already in progress. This is not permissible in Islam.

Note, too, that there appears to have been an unusually large number of late arrivals that day, including the two men in the Argyle Motel carpark who are fired at by the "gunman" while he is driving away from the mosque and the entire Bangladeshi cricket team. The cricketers were later described as being "traumatized" by the incident.

Farid Ahmed — the man in the wheelchair — must also be classified as a "late arrival" or non-attendee, as the "live stream" clearly shows he is not present in the musallā. (In a video from March 15, however, Farid claims he was in the mosque, but not in the prayer hall — where attendance is obligatory during Friday prayers. See the section on Farid on the Who did it? page.) This fact immediately raises two questions: (1) If his wife took or accompanied him to the masjid, why didn't she ensure he was safely inside the prayer hall — especially if, as we are told, she was present in the women's room when the "attack" began? (2) If she really did return to the masjid to look for her husband, after assisting the evacuation of women, why was her "body" found some distance down Deans Avenue? This body, dressed in pink, must be her body, as there were officially only two female casualties at Al Noor, and the other "body" has been formally identified as that of Indian student Ansi Alibava. And finally, why does Ansi Alibava's "body", when photographed a short time after the "attack", have only a tube or pipe protruding from the torso, in the place of her head and long black hair? And what is wrong with her right arm, which appears to be emaciated and at a torturous angle?

Left: The "body" of Husna Ahmed, which was found about 20 meters from the mosque compound's side gate. Right: The "body" of Ansi Alibava, which was found in the gutter at the entrance to the alley in which the "gunman" parked his car. Earlier, while the "gunman" was exiting the mosque for the second and last time, he "fired" at two women in black who were walking through the side gate and on to the public footpath. These are, presumably, the two women pictured above, as no other women are seen in the "live stream". One wonders, therefore, why one of them is now dressed in pink. Muslim convert Nathan Smith is seen "comforting" Ansi's "body", after apparently failing to notice it no longer has a head. Needless to say, he would not have been allowed to do this after a real crime, and the police standing around (but not fully visible in this picture) would have immediately cordoned off the area. The fake blood in the gutter is from a blood squib that discharged when the alleged gunman fired at "Ansi" as she pleaded (in a dubbed-in voice), "Help me! Help me!" — while she still had a head. Finally, it should be noted that when Ansi did have a head, she was not wearing hijab — a little odd for a woman who had, one assumes, just left the masjid. Finally, if the above "Ansi" is a dummy, where is the real Ansi?
Note: Ansi Alibava's case is revisited in greater depth below, in the third section on anomalies.

---

An outline of events related to March 15 in Christchurch

AFTER each item that has a bearing on the events of March 15, I have made a comment in bold face. Throughout this presentation, I have supported my arguments with pictures from various sources, which include, ironically, the Facebook page of Al Noor Mosque. In some instances, I have placed a series of photographs, illustrating a particular person or topic, on a subsidiary page. I have also placed some less important pictures here, and some pictures of the petitions launched after the alleged attacks here.  

Earlier in the month, on March 5-6, a conference for crisis management teams, called "CrisisX: The Readiness Conference", was held at the SkyCity Convention Centre, Auckland. See here for pictures of the conference. — Of possible relevance.

Tellingly, on March 15, a police training exercise/counter-terrorism drill is under way in Christchurch. — As soon as I heard this, I thought, "Oh, Oh, here we go again!" This was the scenario on July 22, 2011, when Anders Breivik allegedly killed a total of 77 people in Norway. The newspaper Aftenposten later commented: "Police had barely finished their training before what they had trained for became reality." Let us not forget, too, that the "terrorist attacks" of 9/11 were preceded by a simulation and at least one drill with a similar scenario. Likewise, the COVID-19 "plandemic" was preceded by Event 201 — "a tabletop exercise that simulated a global pandemic, which resulted from a new coronavirus. The program was hosted in October [2019] by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and World Economic Forum". (Source: usatoday.com). The "plandemic" was also foreshadowed in The Eyes of Darkness, a 1996 novel by Dean Koontz; in a Rockefeller Foundation report that was published in May 2010; in an opening-ceremony event at the London Olympics of 2012, and on the cover of Madonna's Madam X album in June 2019. More recently, we find The Exposé saying in a headline on September 28, 2024: "Caught Red Handed: Fauci, Gates & Moderna responsible for COVID Pandemic — U.S. D.O.D issued 'COVID-19 Research' contract 3 Months before COVID was known to exist — & Fauci & Moderna had a Vaccine ready in Dec. 2019". Also remarkable is the way in which The Economist in 2012 appeared to foretell the Hamas paraglider attack on Israel of 2023. Predictive programming and timeline issues are further discussed, in relation to Linwood Islamic Center, here.

The illustration on the left is a panel from the back cover of Chronicles of False Flag Terror, by Nick Kollerstrom, 2017, Moon Rock Books. — The counter-terrorism drill that morphs into "reality" is a striking phenomenon of the 21st century — and one that Kollerstrom describes as an intelligence test for the alert onlooker. Click here to listen to the relevant part of the Radio 5 Live Drivetime interview, in which Peter Power, the managing director of crisis management firm Visor Consultants, talks to Peter Allen.

Just two more bizarre coincidences?

Some observers, after noting that the police officers flip the above figure like a rag doll, have suggested that it is a dummy. If it isn't, why has the face been blurred? Click here to see an enlargement of the picture, in which the face is clearer, and here to read the Free Thought Project's NZ Police "Happened to Be in a Training Session" When Mosque Shooting Began. There is also a video in which the presence of "global sharpshooters" in Christchurch is discussed. Meanwhile, I would like to ask my credulous reader: How many times does this "coincidence" have to occur before you finally smell a rat? When the "training exercise" runs seamlessly into the "terrorist attack", as it does in this case, does it take an IQ of 150 to see that something is not quite right? Isn't it time we all woke up to what Peter Levenda has described as "the tenuousness of consensus reality"?
Pictures of the ragtag sharpshooters as they are deployed in the wake of the "attack".
Raw footage of the arrest of the alleged gunman, taken by a passing motorist.

The training exercise involves the local hospital. — Fact. "It's reported the officers were training on an unused floor at Princess Margaret Hospital on Friday morning. When the shooting began they were still there, but had firearms and patrol cars parked outside" (Newshub, March 21, 2019). In "Christchurch Decoded? A 'Lone Gunman' — or a Stealthy Coup d'État in Slow Motion?", Steve 'Snoopman' Edwards says there were two other exercises that day — "a military exercise at a Defense Force shooting range in West Melton, 25 kilometers west of the city, and a joint Air Force exercise out of RNZAF Base Woodbourne, near Blenheim". Snoopman's two-part article is here.

---

Advertisements: Take America Back Flag | www.uptownfacts.com | The most popular baby names in Russia. Interestingly, some traditional russian names are popular across all the ex-Soviet republics, in particular Alexander, Sergey, Maksim and Andrey; and Anna, Olga, Sofia and Anastasia. | Advertise your great website here. | get the best preparation for indian civil service exams - visit - https://iasvision.com/ get the highest level support | CSCS was set up to help Get CONSTRUCTION CARD SCHEME ONLINE UK change of nationality. | Translate text, voice, text on picture, files, websites into 109 languages. english to spanish The translator is available on different platforms - Windows, MacOS, Android, IOS.  

---

Hospital staff are told to expect a realistic scene, with armed police running around, ambulances coming and going, etc. — Conjecture, but in line with the known modus operandi of the perpetrators of false-flag terrorist attacks/hoaxes. Cf. the "Boston bombing" and the "Parkland school shooting".

The "terrorist" enters the drama. He is identified as Brenton Harrison Tarrant, a 28-year-old Australian who was raised in Grafton, north of Sydney. He is said to be currently living in Dunedin. — Fact. However, Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff, writing in The Millennium Report, March 18, says Tarrant's age has been confirmed as 42.

Brenton Tarrant is, or was, a real person. — Fact. Click here to see him as a child, and here to see him as a high school student, and here to see him as a young adult in what looks like North Korea.

Early reports of more than one person being involved in the day's "shootings", and of "several IEDs attached to cars" (source: Police Commissioner Mike Bush), are forgotten. The preference is always for the simple, straightforward story of the "lone wolf". No conspiracies, please. — Fact. Update, December 20, 2020: Facebook post from Ross McArthur via Richard Prosser and Kelvin Alp: "My comment in the media today: Ok, I'm just going to come out & say it. As a senior manager in a Govt dept at the time, & having been involved in handling part of the Govt response on the day of the shooting, I was read into the findings and included in the debrief. The Head of Dept that ran our debrief stated the following: 'I've just come from the Beehive debrief with the PM & I think it's now safe to tell you, as it will come out in the court case, there were multiple shooters. Two flew out afterwards.' What our HoD hadn't considered was that, by pleading guilty, Tarrant avoided any testimony, so the disclosure never eventuated. Interestingly, there were around 60 managers & senior staff in the room for this debrief, yet the revelation has stayed secret. (It's amazing what people will do to keep a high-paying [job] &/or Govt role isn't it?) I resigned so I wasn't muzzled."

Tarrant is of quasi-Jewish descent. — Fact. His family emigrated from Palestine in 1948, going first to Britain, then to New Zealand, and finally to Australia. They reportedly gained Australian citizenship in 1970. Veterans Today says (March 28, 2019) it has seen Arabic documents that place Tarrant's family in Palestine in 1948. See here and here.

Tarrant has spent time in Israel. — Fact. "A senior Israeli immigration official said Brenton Tarrant arrived in the country from Turkey on October 25 [2016] using his Australian passport..." — Times of Israel. He reportedly stayed for nine days. But according to other reports, believed to be from Russian military intelligence, there were also longer visits, during which he received military training. His task, according to these reports, was to have been the assassination of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. It's therefore reasonable to assume that the Israelis financed at least some of Tarrant's travels. Other funding could have come from an inheritance when his father died — as some investigators have suggested. Yet another possibility is that he was somehow able to obtain compensation as a "Holocaust survivor". One can discount the claim he made his money through Bitconnect, as this was a scam. Update, December 14, 2020: The report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain on 15 March 2019, released on December 8, 2020, contains more detailed information on Tarrant's movements and funding. See here for press coverage of the report. See here for an enlargement of the commission's map of Tarrant's travels.

Tarrant has also spent time in Pakistan, which he loves. — Fact. "Pakistan is an incredible place filled with the most earnest, kind hearted and hospitable people in the world." — Tarrant's post on the Facebook page of Osho Thang on October 23, 2018. Osho Thang is a Shia-run hotel in Nagar Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan, an administrative territory of Pakistan. Anyone seeking further information on Tarrant's travels will find numerous websites, each giving a slightly different account — including details of forays into Syria's Idlib and Daraa governorates to liaise with Al-Nusra/ISIS fighters. No doubt much of Tarrant's personal history is untrue, if only because of what it omits. As some observers have noted, one of the "requirements" for the job of "lone-wolf" terrorist/assassin (or patsy) is a murky, ideologically conflicted background.  

Tarrant is NOT a racist. — Conjecture, but a reasonable assumption in view of his wide travels and praise for Pakistan and its people. If he is a racist, he is idiosyncratic in this respect. Anyone reading his comments about Pakistan must wonder: Is this the person who seethes with disgust at the sight of Pakistani "invaders" in Europe? Gordon Duff describes him as a sociopath, i.e. a person who lacks empathy. But how does that description square with his evident appreciation of kind-heartedness? In my opinion, Tarrant is probably little more than an (expendable) operative like Lee Harvey Oswald.

Tarrant is a member of the Masonic Forum in Canberra. — Allegation made by Gordon Duff in The Millennium Report, March 18, 2019, but in line with precedent. Anders Breivik, one of Tarrant's putative heroes, was a member of the Norwegian Order of Freemasons, and some of those behind the terrorism of Operation Gladio — what I generally refer to as Gladio I — were members of the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy. (Aside: Members of P2, many of whom were former Blackshirts, wore black robes and addressed each other as "Friar". They were implicated in the murder of Roberto Calvi, "God's banker", who was found hanging under Blackfriars Bridge in London in 1982.) Writing in Cairns News, March 20, 2019, Duff describes the Masonic Forum as a "satanic cult".

In the "shooter's live-stream" — as the "shooter" sits in his car, which he has inexplicably parked at 3:04 — the camera is turned to show what purports to be Tarrant's face. This looks as though it could have been superimposed on the video frame(s). It appears to be floating, and is, in the opinion of some viewers, too far forward of the body. It is also strangely elongated, possibly as a result of a technical problem or of some jiggery-pokery with the image. Viewers will also notice that there is the barest hint of a neck. So the picture doesn't conclusively establish who the driver of the car is. It also raises the question: Why did the "shooter" feel the need to identify himself in this way? — Conjecture, but plausible in this age of photoshopping. Update 10.02.26: See Gareth Jacob's report for a detailed analysis of this anomaly.

Real and faked: The various faces of Brenton Tarrant

Tarrant could not have been made to look more menacing. One is reminded of how pictures of Lee Harvey Oswald were doctored to make him look like a rat. Note, too, how the alleged killer is invariably representative of a target population group. Oswald was a "Communist". Sirhan Sirhan, the alleged assassin of RFK, was a Palestinian. Tarrant is a vilified young white male.


Tarrant's application for a firearms licence, lodged in September 2017 and granted in November 2017. Much is made of this application in the various inquiries into the events of March 15, 2019. But it could be nothing more than a red herring, as the principal weapon used that day was clearly not of the caliber of an AR-15. (See the section on the weapon below.)

The person who is eventually arrested for the alleged crimes is probably Tarrant, but possibly not the "Tarrant" shown driving the car (as we saw above). In other words, the real Tarrant could be a patsy: someone who willingly participated in the drama, without realizing the full extent of the role that was ultimately going to be assigned to him. There are several possibilities. There also could have been some degree of mind control, along the lines of MKUltra. According to Marc Delantre, who is described as a former Mossad agent, "Gladio [controls] their mind through nano-implants. No need [for] any surgery. Any individual can get them through nano/smart dusts...justice will talk to him, but in reality they will talk to Gladio." (In other words, the Christchurch event could be a harbinger of political crime in the transhumanist future.) Shortly before the "live-stream" ends, at 16.50, "Tarrant" himself admits he has taken "five Xanax" — a panic and anxiety suppressant. Regardless of all this, the defendant will be tried and convicted as Tarrant. After that — whatever happens to him — he will not be heard from again. — Much of this is conjecture, but is plausible. The pictures below are from the defendant's court appearance on March 16, 2019, when he pleaded not guilty. In striking contrast to the screenshot above, they show a man with a round face. But until June 14, 2019, the courtroom face was blurred or pixelated by the mainstream media at the request of the judge.  

The initial blurring of Tarrant's face opened the door to speculation, and to at least one spurious representation of him — as American comedian Sam Hyde (below right). Hyde's head is often grafted on to the bodies of criminals.

Yet another face is the face in the rear-view mirror as "Tarrant" turns into the alley beside Al Noor Mosque, after almost missing the turn indicated by the presence of "pit-stop man" — a figure in a red jumpsuit (see below).

---

Mystery of the "mosque shooter's" idle minute explained

As we have seen, "Tarrant" breaks his drive to Al Noor Mosque when he suddenly parks beside the road for no discernible reason. Then, after exactly one minute, a person in red walks past his car. Ten seconds later, "Tarrant" drives off. Some investigators say this person in red is "Tarrant's" handler (or one of his handlers). The person's red clothing signals, "Everything is on schedule. It's okay to proceed". Investigators have also noted the presence of red cars parked along Tarrant's route, including one that is parked immediately outside the mosque, and have theorized that these are "markers". The final okay for the mission comes after "Tarrant" parks in the alley beside the mosque, facing the road. A man in a white shirt and dark trousers walks past the alley, turns slightly, and gives a thumbs-up signal. — An alternative explanation, which I think is less plausible, is that the man is simply acknowledging "Tarrant's" presence.

A figure in red walks past the car at 4.08. Figures in red were also used as markers during the Melbourne car attack of January 20, 2017.

One investigator who fully appreciates the significance of the "red markers" is Kurt Haskell, the American lawyer who revealed that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (the "Underwear Bomber") was allowed to board Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam on December 25, 2009, without a passport. Another such investigator, who says he has also conducted a frame-by-frame analysis of what purports to be the shooter's live-stream, is Max Igan — an Australian activist who fled to Mexico in 2021. "This was not a lone wolf shooting by a white supremacist," he writes. "This was an organized hit using multiple players as clearly seen and evidenced by the shooter's own video. Jacinda Ardern is a liar and the people of New Zealand are being disarmed under false pretenses — and it's happening so fast because the Government is terrified of what will happen if the people find out . . . People simply do not realize how well they have been prepped for this event." But unlike Haskell — and, indeed, all other impartial investigators — Igan believes the "shooting" is real, and that people actually died. — I think Haskell's analysis is sounder than Igan's. I don't think anyone died, or was even wounded, in the "shooting" shown in the "live stream". But as I said above, I think it's possible that people died or (more likely) disappeared in the days leading up to March 15, 2019. (For other possibilities, see my old intro at chchtruth.com/oldintro.) I have occasionally read that Daoud Nabi — widely described as the "mosque greeter" — died of natural causes some days before 3/15, and was posthumously "assigned" to the role of "greeter". I have no opinion on this claim. There is more info about Nabi at kufr.club.

His task complete, "pit-stop man" walks off into the sunset. The alleged shooter enters the alley beside the mosque, and inadvertently gives us a glimpse of his face in the rear-view mirror. Is this Brenton Tarrant?

---

A rousing rendition of Serbia Strong tops Tarrant's playlist

The song is described as a "morale-boosting tune for Serbian forces" during the Balkan wars of the 1990s. The singer, Zeljko Grmusa, has said that, in the wake of the Christchurch event, he felt threatened, and that he wondered whether the police would knock on his door. He has continued to sing at social functions, however.

According to some commentators, the words of this song, popularly known as "Remove Kebab", constitute "hate speech". But assuming the translation from Serbian is accurate, there is nothing more sinister in it than a warning that the Ustase (Croatian nationalist organization) and "Turks" (presumably the Bosnian Muslims) should "watch out". During World War I, when Serbia was on "our" side, it was portrayed as "plucky little Serbia", an outpost of Western civilization. But since the Balkan wars of the 1990s, it has been depicted as a hotbed of genocidal maniacs. That prejudice — and the fact that Tarrant played the song while driving to Al Noor Mosque — is why it was banned by YouTube for a while. Above is the original version.

The identifiable items played by Tarrant are as follows (in order): Serbia Strong, British Grenadiers Fife & Drum, Fallschirmjager remix (old version), Arthur Brown's Fire (see below) and Gas Gas Gas by Manuel. The only other sounds heard inside Al Noor, apart from the repeated firing of Tarrant's replica airgun, are sepulchral groans. There is no shouting, screaming, sound of things being hit or broken, or sound of people running and trying to escape. There is also no gore, and little (fake) blood. Nevertheless, most New Zealand viewers profess to find the scene realistic.

According to Stuff, the "gunman" had attached an audio speaker to the front of his "tactical vest".

Click here to return to the previous mention of Serbia Strong. Conversely, click below to continue.

---

.